Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2025 at 09:26:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info Altar window "Resurrection of Jesus" by the Heidelberg stained glass artist H. Beiler (1888) of the Evangelical City church Bad Rappenau, built 1887 - 1888 by Hermann Behaghel, Bad Rappenau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2025 at 05:48:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Southern_Region_(Suðurland)
Info Breiðamerkurjökull glacier. All by me -- Jakubhal 05:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 05:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 21:59:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Marriage equality rally in front of the US Supreme Court on First Street between East Capitol Street and Maryland Avenue, NE, Washington DC on Tuesday morning, 28 April 2015. Created by Elvert Barnes – uploaded by Fæ – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - What is that behind them in the triangle space between their heads? Are they being photo-bombed? - ERcheck (talk) 04:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- It’s a cop, I think. Honestly, I didn’t even notice him until you pointed him out haha — UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:07, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 21:48:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
Info created and uploaded by i.Mahesh – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 21:38:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Tetragnathidae_(Long-jawed_Orb_Weavers)
Info Orchard orbweaver (Leucauge venusta) in a web in a rose garden. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 21:09:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Gyps
Info created and uploaded by Prasan Shrestha, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support nice pose. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 05:47, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 20:54:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Atmospheric optical phenomena
Info A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station. Browsing through top news photos from last week, I stumbled across this fantastic photo of a gigantic jet, topped with some sprites. Luckily I had a slot open, because how could I not nominate this!
- Created by astronaut Nichole Ayers NASA, uploaded by Huntster, some very light editing and nominated by W.carter. --Cart (talk) 20:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 20:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I remember looking at it when it came out earlier this month and thinking, "FP!" LOL. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:16, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 20:03:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
Info created by Tapas Kumar Halder – uploaded by Tapas Kumar Halder – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 20:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 20:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Weak
Support looks like a delicious imarti. I'm not really a fan of the sugar/misri sprinkle on what is essentially a sugar bomb (and it doesn't make sense to me as an artistic choice either, it's a bit distracting) but that might not be the reaction of someone unfamiliar with an imarti, and it does (though a bit crudely) convey "sweet!" --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 16:08:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Egypt
Info created by RolandUnger – uploaded by RolandUnger – nominated by RolandUnger -- RolandUnger (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- RolandUnger (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light and interesting architecture. And welcome to FPC. :)—UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 09:17:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains_and_water_features
Info There is one FP of this water tower in day light, none of the night lighting. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Super striking photo, a little bit noisy in places but within acceptable limits for me and honestly this is not the kind of motif you pixel-peep anyway Cmao20 (talk) 12:27, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmao20: Thanks for the review. I've applied mild NR and removed some spot reflections. Tagooty (talk) 15:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 07:51:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Ranunculales#Family : Ranunculaceae
Info Columbine flower Akelei Red Hobbit. Focus stack of 17 frames. Cultivated plant in a garden in Bavaria. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail, eye-catching composition --Tagooty (talk) 09:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support You really are the king of focus stacks. However, I have provided a note showing some blue CA on this one. Only a small nitpick but could be improved. Cmao20 (talk) 12:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment: large areas of the petals are overexposed and are devoid of textures; can this be fixed? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Done @Cmao20: @The Cosmonaut: Better? Ermell (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- It definitely improved the appearance of the top-left red petal, but the top-right white petal still has a large overexposed area, which is quite noticeable even in preview. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment The area you marked is not overexposed, as you can see in the histogram. Thank you for your assessment.--Ermell (talk) 09:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- It definitely improved the appearance of the top-left red petal, but the top-right white petal still has a large overexposed area, which is quite noticeable even in preview. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 05:15:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
Info Flower buds of a (Hypericum androsaemum) Focus stack of 25 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely colours and composition --Tagooty (talk) 09:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A very nice one, well done Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Is there a version without the leaves cropped on the right and the left? - ERcheck (talk) 04:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your question. No, this is the only stacked series I've made. These proportions were the best choice for me to make the flower buds stand out.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 02:44:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info: Unnamed beach, North Surin Island, Mu Ko Surin National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Lacks wow compared to the FPs of Thailand scenes in the gallery, sorry. --Tagooty (talk) 09:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support For me, there is charm here. I like the reflections of the trees in the shallow water of the shoreline. The weather may be overcast but I find the light and composition pleasant. Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture, but for someone who is used to beaches and the sea, it doesn't create a wow effect. The upper left part of the image is blurry. There are better candidates for that. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 19:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2025 at 02:44:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info: Unnamed island emerging from Cheow Lan Lake, Khao Sok National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:11, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:10, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2025 at 16:01:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
Info View of the Hyatt Regency Embarcadero 17-story atrium, San Francisco, California, US. Designed by architect John Portman, this interior was once the world's largest hotel atrium when it opened in 1973. The then cutting-edge design has also made the Hyatt Regency a favorite filming location.
- Created by Dale Cruse – uploaded and nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice composition! Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition, but rather low resolution (100MP). JayCubby (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- And only made with a shoddy Hasselblad too... our standards are slipping. ;-) --Cart (talk) 23:07, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:06, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - Wow factor! -- ERcheck (talk) 05:13, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Espandero (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I like such images. And I am fairly surprised how good the quality with ISO6400 is. Medium format makes a huge difference, as it seems --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support In the 1970s I aspired to get pictures like that of Portman's Hyatt Regency Atlanta with my AE-1 and a 28mm lens on Ektachrome 200. It didn't work. Acroterion (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice find. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2025 at 15:34:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info created by Johan Christian Dahl, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Johan Christian Dahl: View from Stalheim, 1842
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:34, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:16, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2025 at 00:55:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
Info created by w:en:Frank Hurley – uploaded and restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Info: an explanation of the compositing: File:Frank Hurley composite image and its components -- the raid (over the top).tif
- Image turned into link. Please never display other images on a nom, the Bot will read it as an Alternative and it messes with the nom. --Cart (talk) 02:43, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart, I didn't know that. Glad to see you are back at FPC though. JayCubby (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Only in a very minor capacity. It's summer, hot and I have other things to do. Will get more active once it cools down. --Cart (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A few scratches could be removed, but obviously huge wow factor Cmao20 (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- A few scratches have been removed. Let me know if any more crop up. JayCubby (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:16, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 23:16, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:47, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2025 at 23:18:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Lygaeidae_(Seed_Bugs)
Info Small milkweed bug (Lygaeus kalmii). You may notice the gallery has one other photo of a similar species, the large milkweed bug. :) This one is smaller (about 1cm long) and I think it came out a little better. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:18, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:18, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Outstanding quality and composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:10, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:15, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2025 at 17:21:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Citrus fruits
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 17:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 17:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support, but @XRay, there is a hot pixel in the bottom right. JayCubby (talk) 19:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll fix within the next days. --XRay 💬 19:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Done Hot pixel (and another one) fixed. --XRay 💬 05:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:32, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:14, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2025 at 17:19:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Cervidae_(Deer)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:31, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 17:40, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I was already planning on suggesting you nom this. :) —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:42, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Great composition Cmao20 (talk) 19:18, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:45, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful! --Tagooty (talk) 23:49, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support! JayCubby (talk) 01:54, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support sublime photo for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 07:38, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Espandero (talk) 09:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Wonderful shot. -- Terragio67 (talk) 10:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2025 at 14:59:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info created by Laszlo1801 – uploaded by Laszlo1801 – nominated by TealComet (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- TealComet (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Hi TealComet, welcome to FP. I can definitely see why you nominated this, it's a nice artistic composition. Unfortunately though the image quality is not high and the sharpness at full size is quite poor, and doesn't compare well to the other FPs in the gallery. Therefore unfortunately it's an oppose from me, but do keep trying and have a look at the other FPs in the plants gallery to see what quality of image usually passes. Cmao20 (talk) 19:17, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2025 at 12:51:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Nyctibiidae (Potoos)
Info created by Charlesjsharp – uploaded by Charlesjsharp – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 12:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Info no FP of this species, nor the family (Nyctibiidae), nor the order (Nyctibiiformes). —Bruce1eetalk 12:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 12:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support valuable within the purpose of the project, and interesting composition. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:15, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:14, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
COM:Categories not sufficiently fixed (as usual). --A.Savin 19:06, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Oppose
- @A.Savin: Sorry, I slipped up there. I've added Category:Nyctibiiformes of Belize, which I had to create. —Bruce1eetalk 09:06, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- OK the location category should be added too. Where was it taken? Orange Walk Town? --A.Savin 09:10, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: I've added Category:Orange Walk District. Looking at the camera location, it's quite far from Orange Walk Town. —Bruce1eetalk 10:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- OK the location category should be added too. Where was it taken? Orange Walk Town? --A.Savin 09:10, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: Sorry, I slipped up there. I've added Category:Nyctibiiformes of Belize, which I had to create. —Bruce1eetalk 09:06, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Great pose --Tagooty (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2025 at 21:20:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Genus_:_Macaca_(Macaques)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support what a cutie! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Super high resolution, good quality, composition, light Cmao20 (talk) 23:41, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 12:54, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
SupportI can't imagine how many hours you have to wait for such a motif. Anyway, a beautiful and educational photograph --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --per others. Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:15, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2025 at 19:29:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Asteroidea
Info Cortez starfish (Pentaceraster cumingi), La Paz, Baja California, Mexico. It is found in warmer parts of the East Pacific (Gulf of California to northwest Peru, including offshore islands like the Galápagos) and in Hawaii. It reaches a diameter of about 30 centimetres (12 in). P. cumingi primarily feeds by scavenging and through a carnivorous diet. Its diet consists of ocean floor algae, microscopic organisms, and seagrass. Note: there are no FPs of the genus Pentaceraster on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Question Do you have more space around, specially at the top? Yann (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yann: I readjusted the crop, moving the starfish downwards as I want to keep the square crop. Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:51, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Marmalade hoverfly
Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2025 at 13:34:51 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Marmalade hoverfly male
-
Another view of the same insect
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family : Syrphidae (Hoverflies)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:48, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:17, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:24, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2025 at 20:48:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United Kingdom#England
Info Ritson's Force waterfalls in the valley of Mosedale, Lake District, England. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 20:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Julian H.✈ 20:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:57, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support not a fan of blurry water but I can't deny the composition is excellent Cmao20 (talk) 11:58, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 07:38, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2025 at 16:20:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Bangladesh
Info created by Azimronnie – uploaded by Azimronnie – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very interesting! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:58, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:57, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:14, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition. Interestingly, no FPs of agriculture in Bangladesh. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 07:39, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:22, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support, but there's some CA on the shirtback. JayCubby (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2025 at 15:22:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Portraits, paintings
Info created by Juan Manuel Blanes – uploaded by Fixertool – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 15:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 15:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support but please add an English description, and some detail about who this individual is as well. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:31, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Good detail, done! thanks --Ezarateesteban 21:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2025 at 12:20:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info First prize in Wiki Loves Monuments India in 2024. There is another FP from Hampi but none of this temple. created by Basavaraj M – uploaded by Basavaraj M – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:37, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
weakSupport light and composition are excellent
but needs very slight perspective correction.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:10, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah you're right, it's just I thought that the correction needed was so slight that it wasn't worth uploading a new version just for that. I will understand if others oppose for this reason though. Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is very slight, hence no oppose from me. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think any perspective correction is needed. Perspective correction done if am not wrong. Basavaraj M (talk) 15:02, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- OK, I took a second look and tried fiddling with the image myself, and now I think you're right. It's the angle more than perspective, the current one seems the best presentation. Changing my vote. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:21, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah you're right, it's just I thought that the correction needed was so slight that it wasn't worth uploading a new version just for that. I will understand if others oppose for this reason though. Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:12, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Info It would be nice if the harsh contrasts could be lifted a bit. Otherwise a decent shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:58, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition with reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 12:58, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition and reflections -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 07:39, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:21, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:07, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2025 at 19:04:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info This innovative yellow boat runs on Lake Geneva and can accommodate 60 peopleː The Hélianthe, which comes from the Greek helios (sun) and anthos (flower), takes its name from the plant of the sunflowers family. It is powered by solar energy thanks to the panels placed on its roof, while maintaining its electric batteries, which gives it 13 hours of navigation autonomy. Solar energy helps lighten the boat’s batteries, thus extending their life. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality, but for FP background is not wowing enough with those cranes and the scaffolded building. I think, this should be done better for our finest images. --Milseburg (talk) 09:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Milseburg. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light, colours, and composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2025 at 14:31:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
Info Launch Vehicle Mark-3 M4, carrying Chandrayaan-3 (a lunar-exploration spacecraft), lifting off from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota, India, in 2023. The eventual success of the mission made India only the fourth country ever to land on the moon. We currently have only one FP from a non-western country in the gallery. Picture created by ISRO – edited (for better light, perspective correction, better crop and reduction of artefacting), uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support the technical quality is not perfect, but is perfectly in line with our other FPs in the gallery. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Unfortunately I wouldn't say it is in line with other FPs in the gallery. The JPEG artefacting at full size is quite severe - beneath the launch vehicle in particular it looks very blocky and over-compressed indeed. The composition is spectacular though. It is a shame you had such highly compressed source material to work with. Cmao20 (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I mean, considering the latest FP in the gallery (this one, promoted 7 months ago) has prominent CAs, distorted perspective and was underexposed, is why I said it is in-line with the other images in the gallery. Older promotions have similar (or worse) issues. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:30, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmao20: Thanks for the review. I have edited it again to get rid of the artefacting while trying my best to preserve as much detail as possible (esp. in the rocket and towers). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:50, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Muddy image but spectacular compo. JayCubby (talk) 16:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:13, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I guess we will have to wait more to see an Indian rocket in that gallery. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2025 at 16:55:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info Сreated by Andy Morffew, uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 16:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Here in the UK, the hawfinch is probably the rarest finch. I have only ever seen one, and had no chance to get a picture. Despite the out of focus tail feathers, this seems excellent to me. Cmao20 (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Ezarateesteban — Preceding undated comment was added at 20:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Stunning photo.MisawaSakura (talk) 18:50, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too yellow in my opinion and too poor description--Llez (talk) 10:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support but agree with Llez, white balance could be less warm -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Very good shot, poor color balance. -- Terragio67 (talk) 03:59, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2025 at 16:55:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
Info Сreated by Andy Morffew, uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 16:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The quality is not there for me in this one. The tail feathers are blown out and the bird appears oversharpened, in my opinion probably to hide a slight motion blur. It's a good image but I think many of the hummingbird images in the gallery are better. Cmao20 (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2025 at 15:17:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Sudan
Info House in a remote village near the granite hills of Kimotong, South Sudan. All houses in the villages are similar in size, shape and build material (grass-thatched mud hut and walls built with mud and stocks). You almost have to crawl to get inside the house, where you can find two rings, the bigger one in the middle is used as kitchen (with a bonfire in the middle) and sleeping room and the smaller ring outside is used for storage. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:39, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support At the top of the roof, the influence of so-called civilized society can be seen.--Ermell (talk) 11:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gallery changed to Architecture, that is where other thatched roof houses are. This is just one house, so not a whole settlement. Even if this is different from the architecture we are used to, there are probably hundreds of years of knowledge and traditions in building a house like this. --Cart (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Question Do you have more space at the top? Yann (talk) 17:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Too tight at the top for me, which means the proportions are no longer quite right.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann and Famberhorst: I've improved the crop a bit Poco a poco (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the small correction. But I think such a unique building deserves a more generous crop.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:53, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:28, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 07:40, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2025 at 09:05:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 09:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support The composition is attractive, and the shadows of the ski lift give punctuation to the otherwise pastoral view. Acroterion (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I dont find compo good. --Mile (talk) 12:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the shadows --Llez (talk) 10:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 14:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2025 at 09:04:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Italy
Info A road viaduct across the Rio Finale valley near Riomaggiore, one of the five villages in the rugged Cinque Terre National Park, Italy. Note: there are no FPs of highway bridges in Italy in the gallery. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2025 at 20:55:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Cândido Aragonez de Faria – uploaded by Hansmuller – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 20:55, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 20:55, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 05:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Unusal film poster, beautiful drawing, good lithograph in good restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 03:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2025 at 13:14:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Canada
Info Three wind turbines along North Middle Road, Essex, Ontario, Canada. The area of Essex north of County Road 8 has numerous wind turbines, which are highly prominent in the area's predominantly flat landscape. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:14, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:14, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 23:00, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but there is nothing here that I consider featured-worthy Poco a poco (talk) 07:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition. And I can see this being a useful image for reusers, maybe as a cover page for a project about renewable energy. Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco, not outstanding, good quality. --Milseburg (talk) 09:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition and educational. —Bruce1eetalk 07:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Reminds me of a stock photo. JayCubby (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2025 at 08:52:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deer)
Info Fallow deer surrounded by bracken in Richmond Park, London. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 08:52, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Julian H.✈ 08:52, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:41, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The bottom edge is too muddy and too annoying. --Milseburg (talk) 09:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral On the one hand the deer is beautiful, on the other hand the blurry part at the bottom is really disturbing. So, I can neither support nor oppose the image. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Wonderful subdued colours which add a touch of magic. No objections to the blurred foreground – that’s foreground bokeh, it’s smooth and clean, and it corresponds with a similar area in the background, resulting in a beautiful framing or even aureole for the deer. – Aristeas (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 03:53, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 09 Jul → Mon 14 Jul Thu 10 Jul → Tue 15 Jul Fri 11 Jul → Wed 16 Jul Sat 12 Jul → Thu 17 Jul Sun 13 Jul → Fri 18 Jul Mon 14 Jul → Sat 19 Jul
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 05 Jul → Mon 14 Jul Sun 06 Jul → Tue 15 Jul Mon 07 Jul → Wed 16 Jul Tue 08 Jul → Thu 17 Jul Wed 09 Jul → Fri 18 Jul Thu 10 Jul → Sat 19 Jul Fri 11 Jul → Sun 20 Jul Sat 12 Jul → Mon 21 Jul Sun 13 Jul → Tue 22 Jul Mon 14 Jul → Wed 23 Jul
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.